<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Progeny Community &#187; Tag: export - Recent Topics</title>
<link>http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/</link>
<description>Progeny Community &#187; Tag: export - Recent Topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:53:30 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Toby McHenry on "Analysis export fails to keep log"</title>
<link>http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/topic/189#post-601</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Toby McHenry</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">601@http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I noticed a problem with Progeny 7, and it's still occurring now that we've upgraded to Progeny 8.  Whenever I do a large analysis export (for example, a PLINK export on a few hundred people with 600,000 SNPs), Progeny loses the log of the export.  Thus, I have no record of what was exported, and cannot rerun the export without recreating it.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Have you seen this before?  I am concerned about how Progeny is scaling to large amounts of data.  We plan to continue adding GWAS SNPs to Progeny.  FYI, this export took about 16 hours to complete.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Thanks!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>mccanejd on "Exporting genotypes when stored at the sample level"</title>
<link>http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/topic/137#post-427</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 12:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>mccanejd</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">427@http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Hello,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I've run into something strange when doing a custom export for individuals who have two different genotypes stored at the sample level. Here's a little background: recently we received a set of samples, in which there were two samples for each individual. The purpose of this study was to examine two different sample preservation methods - ethanol versus blotter paper. So I created the individuals in Progeny, and created two samples for each individual. I then imported the genotypes on the sample level. So at this point each individual had two samples, each with it's own imported genotype. However, when I ran an export of the individuals, the genotypes came out pretty wacky...in some cases the allele A and B were switched, in other cases one allele was a no call and the other an A/C/G/T, and for a few fish the exported allele A/B didn't match the genotypes for either of the samples from the raw import data. I was under the assumption that when you export genotype data for an individual that has multiple samples with their own genotypes, it would export the genotype for the individual's primary sample...any idea what might be going on here?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Thanks,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;-Jesse
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>jennifer-rigdon on "exporting using custom option"</title>
<link>http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/topic/129#post-386</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>jennifer-rigdon</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">386@http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;We often export genotypes from just a cropped portion of our pedigrees.  When this is done using the FBAT option, the founders mother ID and father ID are zeroed (even if they exist in the pedigree).  When this is done using the Custom option, the founders parents are not zeroed and their IDs are included, even if they are not a part of the cropped pedigree that is being exported.  I was wondering about the possibility of the custom option zeroing the parent IDs of the founders.  I was hoping that since this is possible via the FBAT option, it could be possible via the custom option?  Any ideas you have regarding this would be nice. Thanks.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Manuel Teixeira on "Progeny 7 and CancerGene 5"</title>
<link>http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/topic/59#post-116</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 06:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Manuel Teixeira</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">116@http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi. I have just started to use Progeny 7 and I realize that it has an export modek to BRCAPRO. I use CancerGene 5 but I can not find the brca.exe it refers to.&#60;br /&#62;
I would appreciate your help.&#60;br /&#62;
Best regards,&#60;br /&#62;
Manuel
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>jamie-lheureux on "Data Dictionary"</title>
<link>http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/topic/35#post-53</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>jamie-lheureux</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">53@http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;It would be nice to be able to export out a data dictionary.  It could just be the name of all of the fields, the field type, and if possible, the options for drop down fields.  If a description could be added when each field is created that explains that field, that description could also be exported in the data dictionary.  Funding sources often ask for a data dictionary to see what type of data is being collected for a study.  We currently track this in excel and have to remember to update it whenever we change or make new fields.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

