<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Progeny Community &#187; Tag: data sheet - Recent Topics</title>
<link>http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/</link>
<description>Progeny Community &#187; Tag: data sheet - Recent Topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 03:44:34 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Greg M. Silverman on "Attributes for proband vs kindred"</title>
<link>http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/topic/45#post-75</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Greg M. Silverman</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75@http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Am wondering how flexible the data sheet design is. In particular, we have a questionnaire in which the proband has data attributes (i.e., fields) that the kindred do not, so is it possible to either bind a different data sheet to the proband than what we would bind to the kindred, or can we at least hide these attributes for individuals that are not a proband?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;If this is not possible, then I assume our best option would be to enter these data outside of Progeny and then import the required data into Progeny so that we could create the desired pedigree?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Thanks in advance!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Greg--
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
