<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Progeny Community &#187; Forum: Progeny Lab - Recent Topics</title>
<link>http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/</link>
<description>Progeny Community &#187; Forum: Progeny Lab - Recent Topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 03:28:33 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>ldowns on "SNP marker standard alleles"</title>
<link>http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/topic/74#post-159</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>ldowns</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">159@http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I have a marker set of over 180 000 SNPs, but am struggling to get hold of the standard alleles for the set. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I am under the impression (from the user manual) that the standard alleles are optional, and therefore not required, but when I try to import the genotyping data it all gets rejected with the message &#34;Invalid SNP (no allele match for ACTG)&#34;.&#60;br /&#62;
I am certain it has to do with the standard alleles, because I have worked them out from the genotyping data for a couple of markers, and when the markers have standard alleles defined, the genotype imports work perfectly.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Please can someone help me with this?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Thank you
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>jamie-lheureux on "some markers won&#039;t add to sets"</title>
<link>http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/topic/62#post-121</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>jamie-lheureux</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">121@http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;We have a few markers that are in all markers that we can't get to add to sets.  I have tried adding it to the set by right clicking on the set and selecting 'add markers to this set'.  It seems like it gets added (and the others that were with it are added) but when we try to import into the set or search the set it can't be found.  Are there any restrictions on marker names or perhaps the alias for markers in marker sets?  The names seem particularly long, so I am wondering if there is a restriction on the number of characters?  Thanks!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ginny Hughes on "using plates in analysis module"</title>
<link>http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/topic/40#post-65</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 12:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ginny Hughes</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">65@http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Within the analysis module, it would be helpful to have an option to include only people on a particular plate in the analysis.  Currently when you pull a plate into the &#34;pedigree&#34; box, it is not just the people on the plate that are included in the query, but everyone in the pedigree.  Currently there is no way of selecting just the people on the plate for analysis.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ginny Hughes on "querying in the analysis module"</title>
<link>http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/topic/34#post-50</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ginny Hughes</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">50@http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;It would be most helpful to be able to query on pedigree fields (i.e we might want to pull out only pedigrees that have a familial mode of inheritance).  IS there a way to do this?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lizr on "Discrepency checks"</title>
<link>http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/topic/30#post-45</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Lizr</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45@http://www.progenygenetics.com/community/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I find the discrepency checks very useful for checking our data generated on the genome wide platform with our taqman genertaed data for validating SNP's.  It is very useful to see if we have a platform issue when validating these SNP's.  However Currently the database registers AB and BA as discrepent - which they aren't.  This is really frustrating when you have to go through 1000's of these.  I really only want to know if an genotype goes from for example AB to BB or AA, or if there is typing but the second assay is null.  Currently we are working on 7.5.0.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Can you let me know if the latest version does correct this problem?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
